Posts

facebook live streams

Facebook Issued Statement Regarding DJ Live Streams: Terms Are Not Changing Next Month

In the age of quick-sharing and fake news, it’s perhaps no surprise that just last week the entire electronic music world was upset when confronted with headlines stating tha,  as of October of 2020, Facebook and Instagram were not going to be allowing any more DJ live streams on their platforms due to copyright violations.

The articles did indeed specify that Facebook and Instagram intended to make DJ live streams harder than ever, cracking down on any use of music being live-streamed without a proper license. How did this happen? The social media site had updated its terms of services to make ‘music listening’ live streams a bannable offence.

The full updated text can be found below:

Read more

Music Streaming Giant Spotify Faces $1.6 Billion Copyright Infringement Lawsuit

Spotify is facing its biggest lawsuit yet as the music streaming company was hit by a lawsuit from Wixen Music Publishing Inc last week for allegedly featuring thousands of songs, including those of famous acts such as Tom Petty, Neil Young, The Red Hot Chili Peppers and the Doors, without an approved license and compensation to the music publisher.

Wixen, who holds the exclusive licensee of songs such as “Free Fallin” by Tom Petty, “Light My Fire” by the Doors, “(Girl We Got a) Good Thing” by Weezer and works of singers such as Stevie Nicks, is seeking damages of $150,000 per song, the maximum award possible under the U.S. Copyright Act. This brings the total damages requested by the lawsuit to $1.6 billion along with injunctive relief.

According to the aforementioned act, there are two separate copyrights for every recorded song: one for the sound recording and one for the musical composition (the song’s words and musical notation).

According to Wixen, Spotify “took a shortcut” by obtaining necessary rights to the songs’ sound recordings, but failing to obtain the equivalent rights for compositions.

According to the lawsuit, which Qixen filed in a California federal court last week, Spotify failed to get a direct or a compulsory license from Wixen that would allow it to reproduce and distribute the songs.

This isn’t the first time Spotify has fallen in such troubles. Back in May the Sweden-based company agreed to pay more than $43 million to settle a proposed class action alleging it failed to pay royalties for some of the songs it makes available to users.

Currently Spotify is valued at $19 billion, a 20 percent increase in value in the past few months. The company is planning a stock market listing this year.

Universal, Warner Bros. and Sony File Lawsuit Over YouTube Stream Rippers

YouTube Stream Rip

“Stream ripping has become a major threat to the music industry,” says the new lawsuit filed by some of the world’s major record labels in an attempt to tackle what they feel is a serious problem caused by YouTube stream ripping sites.

Universal, Warner Bros. and Sony have joined forces to sue the most prolific of such streaming sites in California federal court. The site is YouTube-mp3.org, one of the countless destinations where music fans can simply copy and paste a YouTube video’s URL to rip and download its audio. Billboard broke the news on the lawsuit, specifying that the labels who filed the lawsuit claim that YouTube-mp3.org and other similar sites put the music industry in jeopardy as they allow individuals to effectively illegally download music instead of paying for downloads or streaming subscriptions. According to the lawsuit, which can be viewed here, YouTube-mp3.org is responsible for around 40% of the hundreds of millions of tracks downloaded through these types of sites on a monthly basis. To clarify, YouTube itself is not a target of the lawsuit and is not being held accountable for the actions of these independent and “rogue” sites.

YouTube-mp3.org is alleged to be run by a German company and German citizen named Philip Matesanz. The accusations include those of copyright infringement as well as claims for contributory copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement and inducement of copyright infringement.